6 Sutton Park Road, Sutton, SM1 2GD
Governance Statement
Policy Statement
The School is committed to upholding the highest standards of governance through transparency, accountability, and continuous improvement. We ensure compliance with regulatory frameworks and best practices, supported by a robust organisational structure and Automated Governance System (AGS). Our governance practices reflect our dedication to academic excellence, ethical conduct, and effective oversight, reinforcing our mission and values.
Principles
- Transparency: Fostering an open governance environment where roles and decisions are clear.
- Accountability: Ensuring all members of the organisation are accountable for their responsibilities.
- Integrity: Upholding the highest standards of honesty and ethical conduct.
- Efficiency: Leveraging AGS to streamline governance processes and enhance performance.
- Adaptability: Demonstrating the ability to adapt to change swiftly and effectively.
- Inclusivity: Encouraging participation from all stakeholders in governance activities.
- Consistency: Applying policies and procedures consistently across the School.
- Data Security: Prioritising the security and privacy of data within the AGS.
- Accuracy: Maintaining the accuracy and reliability of information in governance processes.
- Innovation: Embracing innovative approaches to governance.
- Review: Regularly reviewing organisational and governance structures for continuous improvement.
- Sustainability: Considering the long-term impact and sustainability of governance decisions.
Regulatory Context
This Policy has been developed in line with the applicable laws, regulations, regulatory advice, and sector best practices, including the following:
School Structure
Title |
---|
Definition
School Structure |
Scheme of Delegation
Title |
---|
Rule
Scope Purpose and Scope Apart from delegating day-to-day executive power to the President, the Board of Directors has assigned strategic decision-making authority to the Board of Governors. Under the articles of association, the Board of Governors may establish and delegate powers to other School bodies. It has constituted the Academic Board, as the senior academic authority, and a Quality, Compliance, and Audit Committee. The President, who is appointed by and reports to the Board of Governors, may also establish an Executive Committee. The main aim of this Scheme of Delegation is to outlines the framework within which the Board of Governors and its principal bodies operate. It defines the roles, responsibilities, and authority delegated to School bodies to ensure effective governance, decision-making, and accountability in line with the School's strategic objectives, regulatory compliance, and academic standards. It is expanded upon further in this Governance Statement. Governance Structure The governance of the School is carried out by the following principal bodies:
Under this scheme of delegation, the Board of Governors and the principal bodies above may establish additional boards, committees, or panels as necessary to ensure further effective decision-making and governance. Roles and Responsibilities All School bodies are expected to operate within the limits of its terms of reference, maintaining integrity, transparency, and compliance with all applicable School regulations and policies. All bodies ultimately report directly to the Board of Governors. Reserved Matters The following matters are reserved exclusively for the decision of the Board of Governors:
Financial Delegation Financial authority is delegated as follows:
All expenditure must align with the approved budgets and comply with reserved matters. Any expenditure exceeding these budgets requires prior written approval from the Board of Governors, and a risk assessment must be conducted where necessary. Compliance and Accountability All governance bodies must:
Creation and Authority of Additional Bodies The Board of Governors and principal bodies may establish additional boards, committees, or panels as necessary to facilitate governance. Any such bodies must operate within the authority limits set out in this Scheme of Delegation and are accountable to the Board of Governors. Review and Amendment Procedures This Scheme of Delegation shall be reviewed annually by the Board of Governors or more frequently if necessary to ensure it remains effective and relevant. Governance Support Governance and accountability are supported by the Automated Governance System (AGS), which ensures transparency, compliance, and effective governance practices throughout the School. Summary This Scheme of Delegation defines the roles and responsibilities of each governance body within the School, establishes financial controls, and reinforces compliance with regulatory requirements. It promotes delegation, accountability, and effective decision-making in line with the School's strategic objectives and values. This rule ensures clear delegation and accountability within the School's primary governance structure. It defines the roles and responsibilities of each principal body, maintains integrity, and ensures compliance with regulations. By establishing financial limits and requiring approval for budget exceedance, it promotes fiscal responsibility. The AGS supports transparency and effective governance practices. |
Board of Directors
Title |
---|
Advice
Board of Directors' Legal Responsibility The School is registered as a limited company at Companies House. The Board of Directors, consisting of the two founders of the School who are also the sole shareholders, holds ultimate legal responsibility for the School. This board is legally accountable for the School’s operations and compliance with relevant regulations. This rule ensures that the legal and financial accountability of the School is clearly defined. By specifying that the founders, who are also the sole shareholders, form the Board of Directors, it clarifies who is ultimately responsible for the School’s adherence to legal obligations and operational oversight. |
Advice
Delegation of Authority Under the School’s Articles of Association, the Board of Directors has delegated strategic decision-making authority to the Board of Governors. Additionally, day-to-day executive authority has been ceded to the School President. This rule clarifies the delegation of responsibilities within the School’s governance structure. By specifying that strategic decisions are the purview of the Board of Governors while day-to-day operations fall under the School President, it ensures clear delineation of roles and effective management. |
Advice
Overruling Board of Governors Decisions The Board of Directors reserves the right to overrule any decision made by the Board of Governors. If the Board of Directors chooses to exercise this right, it will issue a public statement detailing the decision and its reasons. This statement will be published on the School’s website to ensure full transparency, accountability, and good governance. This rule ensures that any decision by the Board of Directors to overrule the Board of Governors is conducted transparently. By issuing a public statement, the School maintains accountability and upholds good governance practices. |
Board of Governors
Title |
---|
Definition
About The Board of Governors, as the School’s governing body with powers delegated by the Board of Directors, holds key responsibilities including:
The Board values external expertise and includes independent governors with specialisms in higher education, finance, and business to enhance its decision-making. External experts are consulted for new programme approvals, assessments, and governance. These measures ensure comprehensive oversight and strategic direction, with external expertise providing additional insights and enhancing the School’s governance and decision-making processes. |
Rule
Composition of the Board of Governors The Board of Governors will initially consist of:
This composition ensures that the Board has the necessary leadership and expertise to govern effectively while maintaining clear roles and responsibilities. |
Rule
Expansion of the Board of Governors As School operations grow more complex, the Board of Governors will expand to accommodate this. Before the School reaches 500 enrolled students, the Board will increase to up to 9 voting members (excluding the Secretary) to ensure diverse backgrounds and skills. The expanded Board will include:
Expanding the Board ensures a diversity of perspectives and expertise, enhancing governance and maintaining value for money for students. It supports equality, diversity, and inclusion while promoting wider participation in higher education. |
Rule
Appointment Criteria for Board Members The criteria for appointing Board members are as follows:
These criteria ensure that Board members are thoroughly vetted, align with the School’s values, possess the necessary expertise, and are committed to higher education. This approach supports effective governance, promotes diversity, and ensures the Board remains dynamic and responsive to the School’s needs. |
Rule
Adherence to Code of Conduct and Interest Management All governors must adhere to the Code of Conduct for Governors and also the Declaration/Management of Interests sections outlined in this statement. This ensures that all governors operate within established ethical guidelines and manage any potential conflicts of interest effectively, maintaining the integrity and transparency of the governance process. |
Rule
Responsibilities of the Board of Governors (Terms of Reference) The Board of Governors is responsible for: Strategy
Authority
Monitoring
Academic Standards Oversight
If the Board of Governors overrules the Academic Board, it will issue a public statement and inform relevant bodies, detailing the decision and its reasons. This statement will also be published on the School’s website to ensure transparency, accountability, and good governance. Delegation: Under the scheme of delegation, the Board of Governors can delegate responsibilities and receive reports from principal bodies before each of its three meetings:
Reserved Matters: However, only the Board of Governors can decide on:
Additional bodies supporting School services include:
These bodies report to one of the principal bodies, which then communicates their reports to the Board of Governors. The Board of Governors holds comprehensive responsibility to ensure the effective and transparent management of the School. Its roles encompass setting and overseeing strategic direction, financial authority, and academic standards. By clearly defining these responsibilities and delegating to principal bodies, the Board ensures that it can maintain high standards of governance, accountability, and performance. The inclusion of diverse bodies and independent governors supports robust decision-making and adherence to regulatory requirements, while regular reporting mechanisms facilitate transparency and informed oversight. This structure helps safeguard the School's integrity and strategic objectives while ensuring compliance with legal and external obligations. |
Right
Delegation The Board of Governors may establish and delegate responsibilities to principal bodies and sub-bodies within the School to ensure efficient and effective governance. The following will be defined for each body:
Delegated areas may include:
Delegating responsibilities to specific bodies helps streamline governance processes and ensures that specialised areas are managed effectively. By clearly defining terms of reference and reporting requirements, the Board of Governors can maintain oversight while enabling these bodies to focus on their designated areas. This approach supports a structured and transparent governance framework that addresses key aspects of the School’s operations and compliance. |
Rule
Board of Governors Meeting Procedures
These procedures ensure that meetings of the Board of Governors are conducted in a consistent, transparent, and effective manner. By establishing clear rules for appointment, quorum, decision-making, and changes to the Terms of Reference, the School maintains robust governance and accountability. Regular publication of meeting minutes and voting records enhances transparency, while the involvement of independent members and the Chair’s casting vote help to uphold fair and balanced decision-making processes. |
Executive Committee
Title |
---|
Definition
About The President has been assigned day-to-day executive powers by the Board of Directors. Further to this, the President can set up an Executive Committee of School departments and directors. The Executive Committee is a principal body of the School responsible for overseeing the efficient delivery and quality of School services and reporting to the Board of Governors through the President. Its primary duties include:
The Executive Committee plays a crucial role in ensuring that all aspects of the School, including teaching, assessment, student support services, and infrastructure, operate smoothly and effectively. By overseeing these functions and collaborating closely with students and staff, the Committee helps maintain very high standards of operational excellence. Its focus on monitoring performance and addressing challenges ensures a high-quality experience for students, faculty, and staff, while providing essential advice and support to the Board of Governors and other School governance bodies. |
Rule
Composition and Requirements of the Executive Committee The Executive Committee is composed of:
All members of the Executive Committee are ex officio and must undergo enhanced Disclosure and Barring Service (DBS) checks as a condition of their employment. The Committee engages regularly with students, including through the Monitoring and Evaluation Regulations and Student Engagement Policy, and students and other stakeholders will be invited to attend relevant meetings. This composition ensures that the Executive Committee includes key leaders responsible for different aspects of the School's operations. Enhanced DBS checks are mandated to safeguard students and uphold high standards of governance. Regular engagement with students, facilitated by the Committee, ensures that their perspectives are integrated into the School's operations and strategic decisions. |
Rule
Responsibilities of the Executive Committee (Terms of Reference) The Executive Committee is responsible for: Executive and Operational Management:
Staff Management and Workload Allocation
Monitoring and Review
Reporting and Advisory Role
Risk Management
Annual Reporting
These responsibilities ensure that the Executive Committee effectively manages the School’s operations and strategic activities, maintains high standards of governance, and supports robust risk management. By overseeing and monitoring all critical areas, the Committee helps maintain operational excellence, ensures alignment with strategic goals, and facilitates clear communication and effective decision-making throughout the institution. |
Rule
Operational Procedures for the Executive Committee
These protocols ensure structured and efficient decision-making and reporting processes, contributing to the School’s effective governance and operational success. |
Departments and Teams
Title |
---|
Definition
School Departments under the Executive Committee The Executive Committee oversees the School’s operations through four departments, each managed by a Director:
These departments form the foundation for the School’s strategic and operational success, ensuring all services are delivered effectively and efficiently. Each Director is responsible for managing their department’s activities in alignment with the School’s broader objectives. This structure allows for a clear division of responsibilities, enabling focused management of academic programmes, student welfare, operational logistics, and technological infrastructure. A well-structured departmental system is crucial for effective governance. It enables streamlined communication, decision-making, and resource allocation, ensuring all aspects of the School’s operations are aligned with its strategic goals. This approach enhances overall institutional performance, contributing to a better student experience and operational excellence. |
Definition
Departmental Teams and Business Functions Each department consists of the following teams:
When defining business functions, 'teams' rather than specific job titles are used:
This approach ensures flexibility in team structure, accommodating varying scales of operation while maintaining clear responsibilities and efficient service delivery. It allows for scalability and adaptability as the School grows and evolves. |
Rule
Director Responsibilities and Reporting Directors are responsible for:
This structure ensures regular oversight and accountability, with the Director providing consistent updates and strategic inputs to the EC. It facilitates a clear chain of reporting and approval, maintaining effective communication and alignment with the Board of Governors. |
Rule
Programme and Module Leaders Team The School’s undergraduate and postgraduate courses are led by academic staff in the programme and module teams within the Education Department. Each leaders' team has specific responsibilities:
This rule defines the structure and responsibilities of Programme and Module Leaders Teams, ensuring clarity in their roles and tasks related to programme and module management within the Education Department. It emphasises their responsibilities for maintaining programme and module quality and compliance with regulations. |
Rule
Teaching and Assessment Team The Teaching and Assessment Team support the Module Leaders in the delivery of teaching and assessment. Their responsibilities include:
The team is essential for ensuring effective educational delivery and student success by supporting module leaders, developing resources, providing feedback and maintaining quality assurance, ultimately enhancing the academic experience within the School. |
Rule
Admissions Team The Admissions Team plays a key role in the School’s admissions process, supported by staff trained or experienced in higher education admissions. Their responsibilities include:
This rule outlines the Admissions Team's comprehensive duties, ensuring they provide a seamless experience for prospective students and maintain high standards in service and compliance. It also underscores the importance of collaboration with other teams and adherence to School regulations. |
Rule
Student Success Team The School’s strategy prioritises students, recognising the link between teaching excellence and life experiences. The Student Success Team is dedicated to enhancing the end-to-end student journey, offering support from initial enquiries through recruitment and ongoing well-being initiatives. Its responsibilities include:
The Student Success Team plays a vital role in supporting students throughout their educational journey, ensuring both academic and personal challenges are effectively addressed. By providing comprehensive support—including tutoring, mental health services, and practical assistance—the team enhances students' overall experience and success. Its focus on training staff, contributing to policy, and monitoring wellbeing efforts guarantees a sustained commitment to improving student support. Reporting to the Director of Student Services aligns the team’s activities with the School’s strategic goals, ensuring effective oversight. Realigning the team as a Student Success Team emphasises the importance of the entire student journey, focusing on academic support, well-being initiatives, and alumni relations. This approach enhances student satisfaction and success while maintaining alignment with institutional objectives. |
Rule
Student Experience Committee The Student Experience Committee provides a valuable means of student engagement under the Monitoring and Evaluation Regulations:
This structure ensures diverse representation from all programmes and levels, and effective management of the Student Experience Committee's activities. Regular reporting and clear decision-making processes maintain accountability and progress tracking, ensuring that outcomes are communicated effectively to higher governance bodies. |
Rule
Confirmation of Acceptance for Studies (CAS) Panel The School is dedicated to creating a supportive environment for international students. As a licensed sponsor under the UK's Student Visa system, it follows all UK Home Office and UKVI regulations to ensure a compliant visa process:
This rule ensures that the School adheres to UK visa regulations while providing clear guidelines for managing CAS applications. It defines the roles and processes involved in maintaining compliance and supporting international students effectively. |
Rule
Student Disciplinary Panel The School expects all students to behave with respect and consideration towards everyone in the community, including students, staff, and visitors, and to uphold the School’s reputation and environment:
This rule establishes clear expectations for student conduct and provides a structured approach for managing behaviour through the Student Disciplinary Policy. It ensures that the School maintains a respectful and functional environment while detailing the role and procedures of the Student Disciplinary Panel. |
Rule
Resources Team The Resources Team plays a vital role in ensuring that all resources are effectively managed and integrated to support the School's educational mission. Reporting to the Director of Operations, the team is responsible for
By managing a wide array of resources—both physical and digital—the Resources Team fosters a vibrant, safe, and inclusive environment that enhances the overall student experience, supporting high-quality learning and assessment outcomes. A well-structured Resources Team enhances the educational experience by integrating diverse physical, digital, and human resources. This holistic approach ensures accessibility, safety, and the support necessary for varied learning styles, ultimately fostering an enriching academic environment that promotes student engagement and success. |
Rule
People Team The School is dedicated to recruiting high-quality staff who support its mission and contribute to an excellent academic experience. The People Team is responsible for:
The People Team’s responsibilities ensure that staff are well-supported and fairly compensated, performance is regularly reviewed, and continuous professional development is provided. Effective management of recruitment and appointment processes helps attract and retain quality staff. Promoting equality, diversity, and inclusion fosters a supportive and inclusive work environment. Reporting to the Director of Operations ensures alignment with the School’s strategic objectives and keeps leadership informed of People activities. |
Rule
Marketing Team The Marketing Team is responsible for various functions, including the Accuracy of Information Policy (AOIP):
This rule clarifies the comprehensive role of the Marketing Team in promoting the School's services and maintaining compliance with relevant policies. It ensures that marketing efforts are aligned with recruitment, admissions, and public relations, while also facilitating accurate communication and adherence to regulations. |
Rule
Finance Team The Finance Team, led by the Director of Operations, manages the School's financial systems and processes, including:
This structure ensures efficient financial management and compliance with contractual and regulatory requirements. It supports accurate forecasting, reporting, and strategic planning, while also facilitating coordination with other teams for cohesive operations. |
Rule
Employer Partnership Team The Employer Partnership team cultivates employer connections to enhance student employability and align education with industry needs. Its role is to:
These duties foster strong employer relationships, enhancing student employability through practical experience, tailored career development, and industry-relevant education. By aligning institutional offerings with market needs, the team ensures students are well-prepared for their future careers. |
Rule
IT and AGS Team The School’s digital infrastructure encompasses its hardware and software, including the learning management system and Automated Governance System (AGS). The AGS supports the School’s services, teaching, and community interactions. The IT and AGS Team is responsible for:
The IT and AGS Team maintain the School’s digital infrastructure, ensuring efficient service delivery and adherence to IT policies. They support cybersecurity, provide technical assistance, and facilitate digital training, ensuring that the School follows best practices in IT management. |
Rule
Director Responsibilities and Oversight
Directors will regularly report to the Executive Committee and other relevant bodies on these responsibilities. Directors play a key role in implementing and monitoring strategies, ensuring staff induction and training, managing workloads, and overseeing effective line management and appraisals. Their responsibilities also include clear communication of plans and targets and facilitating effective meetings, all of which support the School’s strategic objectives. Regular reporting ensures alignment with the School’s goals and oversight by relevant bodies. |
Academic Board
Title |
---|
Definition
About The Academic Board, as the senior academic authority of the institution, exercises powers delegated by the Board of Governors. Its responsibilities include:
The Academic Board ensures the institution’s academic standards and quality through its oversight of teaching, research, and examinations. By working with the Executive Committee and external experts, it supports the development and maintenance of academic programmes and adherence to regulations. Regular reporting to the Board of Governors ensures transparency and alignment with institutional goals. |
Rule
Composition of the Academic Board The Academic Board's voting membership, consisting entirely of ex officio members, includes:
This composition ensures a diverse and authoritative representation on the Academic Board, incorporating key academic and administrative roles, an external perspective, and student input once available. |
Rule
Responsibilities of the Academic Board (Terms of Reference) The Academic Board is responsible for:
The Board produces reports for the Board of Governors' annual meetings, including those from examination boards. The Academic Board ensures academic quality and standards through its oversight of examination boards, research ethics, and programme approvals. It fosters innovation, manages risks, and collaborates with external experts and regulatory bodies. By proposing policy changes and advising the Board of Governors, it maintains the School's academic integrity and effectiveness. Regular reporting ensures transparency and accountability. |
Rule
Academic Board Operations The Board operates as follows:
These procedures ensure effective and transparent operation of the Board, with clear rules for decision-making, voting, and reporting. By maintaining flexibility in meeting formats and ensuring thorough debate and accurate record-keeping, the Board supports its role in overseeing academic quality and standards. |
Quality, Compliance, and Audit Committee
Title |
---|
Definition
About The Quality, Compliance, and Audit Committee is a principal body responsible for:
The Committee ensures the School’s financial and operational resilience by managing risks, overseeing audits, and evaluating internal controls. Its work is essential for maintaining institutional trust and safeguarding the School’s assets and reputation. |
Rule
Quality, Compliance, and Audit Committee Membership In terms of membership:
These membership rules ensure that the Committee is comprised of a diverse group with independent oversight, prioritising student input where feasible. The requirement for non-executive members helps maintain impartiality, particularly as the School grows. Prompt replacement of absent members ensures the Committee’s effectiveness and continuity. |
Rule
Responsibilities of the Quality, Compliance, and Audit Committee (Terms of Reference) The Quality, Compliance, and Audit Committee is responsible for:
The Committee will report to the Board of Governors before their meetings, including a summary of its activities, significant issues, and recommendations. The Board of Governors will review these reports as part of its assessment of all principal body reports. These terms of reference ensure the Quality, Compliance, and Audit Committee comprehensively oversees risk management, financial integrity, compliance, and ethical standards. Regular reporting to the Board of Governors guarantees transparency and accountability in addressing significant issues and recommendations. |
Rule
Quality, Compliance, and Audit Committee Operating Procedures
These procedures ensure that the Quality, Compliance, and Audit Committee operates effectively with clear rules for meeting frequency, quorum, and decision-making. By aligning meetings with Board schedules, ensuring transparency through published minutes, and maintaining a robust arrangement process, the Committee supports its role in overseeing audit and compliance functions. |
Other Boards, Committees, and Panels
Title |
---|
Definition
Other School Bodies The Board of Governors serves as the governing body of the School. It relies on several principal bodies to ensure effective delivery of the School's services. These principal bodies report to the Board of Governors before its three annual meetings. The principal bodies include:
Sub-bodies that support service delivery are as follows:
As the School expands, additional sub-bodies may be established, such as:
All sub-bodies report to one of the principal bodies, which may also create or disband further sub-bodies as necessary. Student membership must be a priority when proposing new sub-bodies. All bodies must comply with the Scheme of Delegation and other rules and procedures outlined in this statement. This framework ensures that the Board of Governors maintains effective oversight and governance through its principal bodies and supporting sub-bodies. Regular reporting and adherence to procedures facilitate efficient operation and accountability, while accommodating the School’s growth and ensuring student representation. |
Rule
Module Examination Board The School's examination boards are essential for upholding the academic integrity, consistency, and fairness of assessment processes and qualifications. The Module Examination Board , with delegated authority from the Academic Board, must ensure:
The Module Examination Board reports to the Academic Board. For detailed information on its composition, responsibilities, and operations, refer to the Examination Boards and Academic Appeal Regulations. The examination boards play a crucial role in maintaining the credibility and excellence of the School’s academic programmes. By ensuring assessments are fair, transparent, and consistently applied, they help uphold the School’s standards and provide a platform for continuous improvement. |
Rule
Programme Examination Board The Programme Examination Board, under the Academic Board's authority, must:
The Programme Examination Board is accountable to the Academic Board. For more details, please consult the Examination Boards and Academic Appeal Regulations. This ensures all awards and decisions are credible, standardised, and compliant with academic and sector requirements. |
Rule
Research Ethics Committee The Academic Board will convene a standing Ethics Committee meeting each semester, with additional meetings scheduled as needed.
Please see the Research Ethics and Governance Code of Practice. The standing meetings ensure that ethical compliance is reviewed regularly and efficiently, with decisions promptly addressed to uphold the School’s standards. Recording and storing actions on the AGS supports transparency and accountability in the review process. |
Rule
Extenuating Circumstances Committee (ECC) The School’s Extenuating Circumstances and Submission Extension Regulations supports students facing unforeseen challenges that may affect their academic performance.
For details on the ECC:
The Extenuating Circumstances and Submission Extension Regulations ensure that students facing significant disruptions receive fair consideration for their circumstances. The process through the AGS and the ECC’s oversight maintains a structured and transparent approach to managing and evaluating such cases. |
Rule
Academic Misconduct Panel The School is dedicated to maintaining academic integrity, which is crucial to its educational mission. Academic misconduct, such as plagiarism, cheating, and falsification, is addressed through clear guidelines and procedures in the Academic Misconduct Regulations.
For details on the Academic Misconduct Panel:
This rule ensures that any academic misconduct is dealt with systematically and transparently, reinforcing the School’s commitment to academic integrity and maintaining trust within its educational environment. |
Rule
Exclusion Panel The School’s Exclusion Regulations ensure the maintenance of academic integrity, safety, and overall well-being by setting guidelines for student behaviour and academic performance. These regulations apply to both undergraduate and postgraduate students, promoting a high-quality learning environment.
For detailed information:
These rules are designed to uphold high standards of behaviour and academic performance, ensuring a safe and effective learning environment. The Exclusion Panel's role in decision-making and reporting maintains the integrity and safety of the School community. |
Meetings, Reports, and Annual Review
Title |
---|
Rule
Executive Committee: Meetings and Reports The Executive Committee meets weekly to address immediate operational issues and holds comprehensive meetings in week 8 of each semester, totalling three times a year. These comprehensive meetings prepare detailed reports for the Board of Governors.
The Executive Committee reports on:
The reports are vital for:
The Committee uses a structured reporting system:
Regular and detailed reporting ensures that the School’s strategies and operations remain aligned with its mission and goals. By addressing immediate issues and focusing on long-term planning, the Executive Committee supports academic quality, operational efficiency, and financial health. The structured reporting system provides clear oversight and direction, helping the School adapt and thrive. |
Rule
Academic Board: Meetings and Reports The Academic Board meets in week 8 of each semester, a total of three times a year, one month before the Board of Governors meetings. These meetings are dedicated to reviewing academic standards, policies, and the quality of educational programmes, ensuring timely recommendations and insights that align with the Board of Governors’ strategic planning. The Academic Board reports on:
The Academic Board’s reporting ensures:
The reporting process includes:
Regular and detailed reporting ensures that the Academic Board maintains high academic standards and responds to sector changes effectively. By reviewing and reporting on key areas such as programme approvals, research ethics, and academic quality, the Board supports the School in staying competitive and upholding its academic reputation. The structured reporting process facilitates thorough evaluation and informed decision-making by the Board of Governors. |
Rule
Quality, Compliance, and Audit Committee: Meetings and Reports The Quality, Compliance, and Audit Committee meets in week 8 of each semester, a total of three times a year, in line with the Board of Governors’ meetings. These sessions align with financial quarters and regulatory reporting cycles, allowing the Committee to provide timely updates on risk management, internal controls, and financial integrity. This ensures that the Board receives current information to support informed and strategic decision-making. The Committee reports on:
The Committee’s reports are essential for:
The Committee reports are detailed and include:
Regular and detailed reporting ensures that the Quality, Compliance, and Audit Committee maintains high standards of financial integrity and risk management. By aligning their meetings with financial and regulatory cycles, the Committee provides timely and relevant updates that support effective decision-making by the Board of Governors. Comprehensive reporting and clear communication help uphold institutional resilience, regulatory compliance, and continuous improvement in operational practices. |
Rule
Board of Governors: 3 Annual Meetings The Board of Governors convenes in week 11 of each semester, three times annually. These meetings are structured as follows:
These meetings provide a structured framework for the Board of Governors to review past performance, approve future plans, and ensure ongoing alignment with the School's strategic vision and regulatory requirements. The scheduled agendas facilitate comprehensive reviews, strategic planning, and progress monitoring, enabling timely adjustments and informed decision-making to uphold the School’s mission and goals. |
Rule
Ad Hoc Sessions and Reporting for the Board of Governors The Board of Governors may convene ad hoc sessions and request reports as needed. This flexibility allows the Board to address urgent or unexpected issues promptly and to obtain necessary information for informed decision-making outside of the scheduled meetings. |
Rule
Alignment of Other Meetings During each meeting, the Board of Governors reviews reports from the Executive Committee, Academic Board, and Quality, Compliance, and Audit Committee.
The principal bodies should align their meetings with the Board of Governors' schedule to ensure timely reporting. The Automated Governance System (AGS) will manage the annual calendar, coordination, and distribution of agendas and papers to all Board members. This approach ensures that the Board receives comprehensive and timely updates, facilitating informed decision-making and alignment with the School’s strategic, financial, and academic goals. Coordination of meetings and reports enhances operational efficiency and supports effective oversight. |
Rule
Reporting and KPI Evaluation by the Board of Governors The Board of Governors' report comprises key sections reflecting its broad responsibilities, with a focus on:
Reports are structured to ensure the School's strategic vision, financial stability, and academic excellence are maintained throughout the academic year. Under the Key Performance Indicator (KPI) and Reports Policy, the School has six strategic aims, including:
These are measured by ten high-level KPIs. The Board of Governors is responsible for reviewing these KPIs at least three times a year, with contributions from all bodies, especially through their reports. Additionally, sub-indicators in regulations and policies help the Board assess performance comprehensively, including progression and academic standards, which is summarised in an annual report. This structured reporting ensures comprehensive evaluation of performance and alignment with the School’s strategic aims. Regular review of KPIs and strategic areas helps maintain financial and academic excellence, supports effective decision-making, and ensures transparency in the School’s progress. |
Rule
Annual Reporting and Stakeholder Feedback Communication The School produces an annual report after the Board of Governors' second meeting, which provides a summary of activities and achievements from the year. This report includes details on actions taken in response to feedback and student engagement. Additionally, the School uses the news and broadcast section on its website and the Automated Governance System (AGS) to inform stakeholders about how their feedback has been addressed, as appropriate. This process ensures transparency and accountability by documenting the School's yearly activities and improvements. Communicating through the website and AGS keeps stakeholders informed about the impact of their feedback, reinforcing engagement and trust in the School’s responsiveness. |
AGS: Transparency, Recordings, and Audits
Title |
---|
Definition
Governance System and Accountability All School bodies are crucial for the effective operation of the institution, as outlined in the regulations and policies. To support this, the School utilises the Automated Governance System (AGS) to ensure robust, reliable, and transparent governance. The AGS facilitates effective management, operational efficiency, and accountability. A well-functioning governance system is essential for maintaining the School's effectiveness and transparency. The AGS provides the necessary tools for managing operations and ensuring accountability, thereby supporting the School’s overall governance framework. |
Rule
Integration of Quality and Standards Processes The School integrates many quality and standards processes from its regulations and policies into the Automated Governance System (AGS). The AGS manages and stores essential information, such as student marks, and facilitates the initiation, coordination, and completion of processes like Examination Board meetings. This integration ensures operational efficiency, provides a transparent audit trail, and maintains security. By centralising these processes, the AGS supports effective management and oversight of academic quality and standards. |
Rule
Scheduling and Recording of Committee and Board Meetings All committee and board meetings within the School will be scheduled through the School's Academic Governance System (AGS) to ensure fairness and transparency.
Utilising the AGS for scheduling and record-keeping promotes transparency and ensures that meetings are conducted systematically and documented accurately. This approach facilitates effective governance and compliance with institutional standards. |
Rule
Meeting Transcription and Action Points Management The AGS ensures the following procedures for managing meeting records and action points:
These procedures streamline the documentation process, ensuring timely distribution of meeting records and allowing for accurate and efficient tracking of action points. This system enhances transparency, reduces administrative burden, and maintains clear communication among participants. |
Rule
Meeting Recording and Access Policy The AGS ensures the following for meeting recordings:
This policy ensures that meeting recordings are securely managed and kept confidential, while still providing access to authorised personnel and regulatory bodies. The procedure maintains transparency and accountability while protecting participants' privacy. |
Rule
Meeting Record Archiving and Access Policy The AGS ensures the following for meeting records:
This policy guarantees the secure storage and management of meeting records, complying with data protection regulations and ensuring that records are accessible only to authorised individuals. It also outlines the conditions under which records may be deleted or destroyed, ensuring adherence to legal and regulatory requirements. |
Declaration/Management of Interests
Title |
---|
Definition
About this Policy This policy ensures that:
Maintaining integrity and a positive reputation is crucial for public confidence and the success of the School's mission. This policy promotes transparency and accountability, helps identify and manage conflicts of interest, and ensures that all individuals associated with the School act with high ethical standards. The policy will be reviewed every three years, or sooner if needed, to ensure its continued relevance and effectiveness. |
Rule
Declaration of Interests All board and committee members, as well as staff, must declare any interests that could be perceived as influencing their work with the School. This includes:
Interests must be declared if they are reasonably relevant or could be perceived as relevant to the School’s activities. This includes both financial and non-financial interests. Financial Interests:
Non-Financial Interests:
Declarations should be made annually, before commencing any role at the School, or when new interests arise. If unsure whether an interest should be declared, consult the President, a Board of Governors member, or the relevant departmental director. If there are no interests to declare, submit a "nil return." Declaring all relevant interests is crucial for maintaining transparency and avoiding conflicts of interest, ensuring that decisions are made impartially. This practice upholds the School’s integrity, supports public confidence, and aligns with high standards of accountability and governance. |
Rule
Declaration of Interests Procedure Declarations of interests must be made:
The declaration form is available below. Declaration of Interest Form (DRAFT).docx Regular and timely declarations ensure transparency and help manage potential conflicts of interest. This process upholds the School’s commitment to high standards of governance and accountability. |
Rule
Records and Publications In terms of recording and registration:
Exceptions: Individuals with substantial reasons for not publishing their interests should contact the President or relevant Director to explain their concerns. In exceptional cases, such as risks to personal safety or confidentiality, the School may withhold or redact information. This will be decided by the President, with an appeal option to the Board of Governors. Information will not be withheld solely based on personal preference. These measures ensure transparency and accountability while protecting individual privacy and safety when necessary. The process aims to enhance the management of interests and improve governance practices within the School. |
Rule
Responding to Declared Interests The appropriate response to a declared interest is contingent upon the person's position and the level of risk for a potential conflict of interest.
These measures ensure that declared interests are appropriately reviewed and managed to maintain integrity and prevent conflicts of interest. By establishing clear procedures for reviewing and addressing conflicts, the School promotes transparency and accountability in its governance practices. |
Rule
Principal Body Meetings
If a member has an actual or potential conflict of interest, the chair should:
These procedures ensure that conflicts of interest are managed effectively during meetings. By clearly identifying and documenting conflicts, and by taking appropriate actions, the School maintains transparency and upholds the integrity of its decision-making processes. |
Rule
Dealing with Breaches A breach occurs when interests are not properly identified, declared, or managed. Breaches can be unintentional or intentional. Reporting a Breach:
Investigation of Reported Breaches:
Post-Investigation Actions:
This policy ensures that breaches in interest management are addressed effectively and transparently. By establishing clear procedures for reporting, investigating, and addressing breaches, the School maintains high standards of accountability and integrity. |
Rule
Integration with Other Policies and Legislation This policy must be read in conjunction with other School regulations and policies, including:
Additionally, it should be considered alongside relevant legislation such as:
By aligning this policy with existing regulations and legislation, the School ensures comprehensive and consistent management of interests, enhancing overall compliance and integrity across its operations. |
Metrics and KPIs
The following metrics will be measured and regularly reviewed as key performance indicators for the School to ensure the effectiveness of this policy and associated operations.
Title |
---|
Adoption Rate of Innovative Learning Technologies
At least 60% of courses integrating new technologies annually. Adoption of innovative technologies enhances teaching effectiveness, student engagement, and prepares students for a tech-driven workforce, aligning with institutional goals for innovation. |
Curriculum Review and Update Rate
100% of academic programs reviewed and updated at least every 6 years. Regularly reviewing and updating the curriculum ensures that courses remain current, pedagogically sound, and aligned with both academic advancements and the institution's strategic priorities, which helps maintain accreditation standards and enhances student outcomes. |
Graduate Employment Rate within 6 Months
Measure the percentage of graduates employed in their field of study or pursuing further education within six months of graduation. 85% employment or further education rate within six months post-graduation. High graduate employment rates indicate the effectiveness of the institution’s educational offerings and career support services, which is crucial for reputation and student recruitment. |
Industry Partnership Engagement Index
Establish at least 15 active industry partnerships annually, with a minimum of 10 contributing to curriculum development or student placements. Strong industry partnerships ensure curriculum relevance, provide practical experience for students, and foster research and funding opportunities, aligning with strategic goals for growth and impact. |
On-Time Graduation Rate
Achieve a graduation rate of 80% or higher within the expected timeframe. A high on-time graduation rate reflects the quality of academic programs, effective student support services, and student satisfaction, which are critical for institutional success. |
Operating Surplus as a Percentage of Total Revenue
Maintain an operating surplus of at least 5% of total revenue each year. Demonstrates financial health and the ability to invest in future growth, infrastructure, and strategic initiatives without compromising fiscal stability. |
School Survey Satisfaction Rate
Measure student satisfaction using internally conducted school surveys, focusing on teaching quality, support services, facilities, and overall experience. Achieve an average satisfaction score of 90% or higher in all key areas annually. Regular internal surveys provide direct feedback for continuous improvement, reflecting the effectiveness of policies and services in enhancing the student experience. |
Student Diversity and Inclusion Index
Track the diversity of the student body by measuring the representation of different demographics (gender, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, disability) across all programs. Achieve a diversity representation index score increase of 10% over three years and ensure retention rates across all demographics are within 5% of each other. A diverse and inclusive student body creates a richer learning environment, meets equity goals, and enhances the institution's reputation for inclusivity and social responsibility. |