Company number: 12497951
6 Sutton Park Road, Sutton, SM1 2GD

Regulations and Policies Policy

Policy Statement

The School is committed to upholding rigorous standards through its Academic Regulations and Policies. Only the Board of Governors can amend regulations and Codes of Conduct, based on recommendations from the Executive Committee, Academic Board, and relevant bodies. The Executive Committee manages policy changes, ensuring all updates are communicated to the Marketing Team for accurate posting on the website and AGS, and notified to all Directors and students.

Principles

Coherence: Ensuring all policies are aligned with the School’s mission and values.
Accessibility: Making all policies easily accessible to relevant stakeholders.
Clarity: Providing clear and understandable language in policy documents.
Review: Regularly reviewing policies to ensure currency, relevance, and effectiveness.
Consultation: Involving stakeholders in the policy development and review process.
Compliance: Ensuring all policies comply with applicable laws and regulations.
Transparency: Operating with transparency in the policy-making process.
Accountability: Clarifying roles and responsibilities in policy implementation and adherence.
Equity: Applying policies equitably across the School community.
Efficiency: Streamlining policy processes for operational efficiency.
Improvement: Continuously seeking to improve policies based on feedback and changing needs.
Responsiveness: Reacting promptly to the need for policy creation, revision, or rescindment.

Regulatory Context

This Policy has been developed in line with the applicable laws, regulations, regulatory advice, and sector best practices, including the following:

Authority	Name	Url
Office for Students (OfS)	Regulatory Notices and Advice Regulatory notices are additional information about OfS' regulatory requirements and are part of the regulatory framework. Regulatory advice helps providers understand and meet OfS requirements.
Quality Assurance Agency (QAA)	The Quality Code This code represents a shared understanding of quality practice across the UK higher education sector, protecting public and student interests and championing the UK's reputation for quality.
Advance HE	Code of Governance for Universities A code of governance that sets out the principles and standards that universities in the UK should follow.
Committee of University Chairs	The Higher Education Code of Governance A code aimed at ensuring the highest levels of governance at higher education institutions.

Authority

Name

Url

Office for Students (OfS)

Regulatory Notices and Advice
Regulatory notices are additional information about OfS' regulatory requirements and are part of the regulatory framework. Regulatory advice helps providers understand and meet OfS requirements.

Quality Assurance Agency (QAA)

The Quality Code
This code represents a shared understanding of quality practice across the UK higher education sector, protecting public and student interests and championing the UK's reputation for quality.

Advance HE

Code of Governance for Universities
A code of governance that sets out the principles and standards that universities in the UK should follow.

Committee of University Chairs

The Higher Education Code of Governance
A code aimed at ensuring the highest levels of governance at higher education institutions.

Framework for Academic Regulation and Policy Amendments

Frequency	Title
	Rule Standard Format for Academic Regulations and Policies All Academic Regulations, codes of conduct, and policies must adhere to a standard format before publication. This format includes: Description: An introductory statement outlining the purpose and importance of the regulation or policy. Core Principles: A set of fundamental principles that guide the regulation or policy. Regulatory Context: A list of relevant laws, regulations, and external provisions. KPIs and Metrics: Key performance indicators to assess and improve effectiveness. Version Control Information: Details of version numbers, dates of changes, and responsible owners. This standardised format ensures clarity, consistency, and transparency in Academic Regulations and policies. It facilitates understanding, compliance, and ongoing assessment, contributing to effective governance and continuous improvement in line with legal and regulatory requirements.
Case by case only	Rule Approval and Implementation of Academic Regulations, Codes of Conduct, and Policies Changes Framework Academic Regulations are designed to ensure that all programmes meet the required quality and standards. Codes of Conduct define acceptable behaviour for all members of the School community. Policies operate under these regulations, outlining systems to ensure the effective delivery of School services. Approval Process The Board of Governors is responsible for approving changes to Academic Regulations and Codes of Conduct. The Executive Committee approves policy changes following consultation with relevant bodies. This ensures that all changes align with the School’s mission, vision, and strategic objectives. Meeting Protocols Agenda: Must include details of the requested changes. Documentation: Original versions, proposed drafts, and a rationale for changes must be presented. Discussion: Proposed changes and stakeholder feedback, including that from students, should be discussed. Voting: Follow established voting procedures for decision-making. Recording: All discussions and decisions must be accurately minuted and recorded. Alignment: Ensure changes are in line with the School’s vision and strategy, and that they are clear and accessible. Changes may be approved, rejected, or returned for revision before being resubmitted. Post-Approval Process Once changes are approved and minuted, the Marketing Team is responsible for formatting the documents, assigning version control, and ensuring that updates are applied. The Marketing Team must also publicise the changes through relevant channels and provide contact information for queries. This process ensures that Academic Regulations, Codes of Conduct, and Policies are thoroughly reviewed, aligned with the School’s strategic goals, and communicated effectively. It fosters transparency and compliance, ensuring that all stakeholders are informed and able to engage with the changes.
	Rule Consultation and Expert Review for Regulation and Policy Changes Before approving any new academic regulations or policies, or amending existing ones, the Board of Governors or Executive Committee must consult with relevant internal and external stakeholders. This includes engaging with School bodies and students to gather their feedback. Stakeholder input is essential to ensure inclusivity and engagement in the development process. The Board of Governors or Executive Committee will request this feedback as part of their review. Additionally, if necessary, the Board of Governors or Executive Committee may seek external expert consultation—such as input from academics at other higher education institutions—to inform their decision-making before finalising any changes to regulations or policies. Consulting with stakeholders and seeking expert advice ensures that academic regulations and policies are well-informed, inclusive, and aligned with best practices. This process supports transparency, enhances the quality of decision-making, and ensures that the interests of all parties are considered before final approval.
	Rule Implementation and Reporting of Regulations and Policy Changes Directors must ensure that all changes to regulations, codes of conduct, and policies are effectively implemented within their departments and teams. They are required to report on compliance, metrics, and performance to the Executive Committee in their weekly and other reports. Only the most recent versions, as uploaded and communicated by the Marketing Team, should be used. Ensuring that all updates to regulations and policies are properly implemented and reported maintains consistency and compliance across the institution. Regular reporting and using only the latest versions help uphold the integrity of the School’s governance and ensure alignment with current standards and practices.

Frequency

Title

Rule
Standard Format for Academic Regulations and Policies

All Academic Regulations, codes of conduct, and policies must adhere to a standard format before publication. This format includes:

Description: An introductory statement outlining the purpose and importance of the regulation or policy.
Core Principles: A set of fundamental principles that guide the regulation or policy.
Regulatory Context: A list of relevant laws, regulations, and external provisions.
KPIs and Metrics: Key performance indicators to assess and improve effectiveness.
Version Control Information: Details of version numbers, dates of changes, and responsible owners.

This standardised format ensures clarity, consistency, and transparency in Academic Regulations and policies. It facilitates understanding, compliance, and ongoing assessment, contributing to effective governance and continuous improvement in line with legal and regulatory requirements.

Case by case only

Rule
Approval and Implementation of Academic Regulations, Codes of Conduct, and Policies Changes

Framework

Academic Regulations are designed to ensure that all programmes meet the required quality and standards. Codes of Conduct define acceptable behaviour for all members of the School community. Policies operate under these regulations, outlining systems to ensure the effective delivery of School services.

Approval Process

The Board of Governors is responsible for approving changes to Academic Regulations and Codes of Conduct. The Executive Committee approves policy changes following consultation with relevant bodies. This ensures that all changes align with the School’s mission, vision, and strategic objectives.

Meeting Protocols

Agenda: Must include details of the requested changes.
Documentation: Original versions, proposed drafts, and a rationale for changes must be presented.
Discussion: Proposed changes and stakeholder feedback, including that from students, should be discussed.
Voting: Follow established voting procedures for decision-making.
Recording: All discussions and decisions must be accurately minuted and recorded.
Alignment: Ensure changes are in line with the School’s vision and strategy, and that they are clear and accessible.

Changes may be approved, rejected, or returned for revision before being resubmitted.

Post-Approval Process

Once changes are approved and minuted, the Marketing Team is responsible for formatting the documents, assigning version control, and ensuring that updates are applied. The Marketing Team must also publicise the changes through relevant channels and provide contact information for queries.

This process ensures that Academic Regulations, Codes of Conduct, and Policies are thoroughly reviewed, aligned with the School’s strategic goals, and communicated effectively. It fosters transparency and compliance, ensuring that all stakeholders are informed and able to engage with the changes.

Rule
Consultation and Expert Review for Regulation and Policy Changes

Before approving any new academic regulations or policies, or amending existing ones, the Board of Governors or Executive Committee must consult with relevant internal and external stakeholders. This includes engaging with School bodies and students to gather their feedback.

Stakeholder input is essential to ensure inclusivity and engagement in the development process. The Board of Governors or Executive Committee will request this feedback as part of their review.

Additionally, if necessary, the Board of Governors or Executive Committee may seek external expert consultation—such as input from academics at other higher education institutions—to inform their decision-making before finalising any changes to regulations or policies.

Consulting with stakeholders and seeking expert advice ensures that academic regulations and policies are well-informed, inclusive, and aligned with best practices. This process supports transparency, enhances the quality of decision-making, and ensures that the interests of all parties are considered before final approval.

Rule
Implementation and Reporting of Regulations and Policy Changes

Directors must ensure that all changes to regulations, codes of conduct, and policies are effectively implemented within their departments and teams. They are required to report on compliance, metrics, and performance to the Executive Committee in their weekly and other reports.

Only the most recent versions, as uploaded and communicated by the Marketing Team, should be used.

Ensuring that all updates to regulations and policies are properly implemented and reported maintains consistency and compliance across the institution. Regular reporting and using only the latest versions help uphold the integrity of the School’s governance and ensure alignment with current standards and practices.

Dissemination and Communication of Updates

Title
Rule Accessibility of Regulations, Codes of Conduct, and Policies All current versions of Academic Regulations, codes of conduct, and policies must be made readily accessible. They should be available on the School’s website and Automated Governance System (AGS) to ensure ease of access for all stakeholders. Ensuring that the latest versions of regulations, codes of conduct, and policies are accessible supports transparency and allows all stakeholders to stay informed about the School’s standards and procedures. This promotes compliance and facilitates effective governance by providing clear, up-to-date information.
Rule Version Control and Metadata for Regulations and Policies All published regulations, codes of conduct, and policies must include: Version numbers Review dates Owners The Marketing Team is responsible for ensuring this information is included in all communications. Including version numbers, review dates, and ownership details ensures clarity and helps track updates. This practice supports effective document management and aids in maintaining up-to-date information, which is crucial for compliance and transparency.
Rule Accuracy of Information Policy (AOIP) Implementation The School’s Accuracy of Information Policy (AOIP) requires the Marketing Team to: Ensure that all information on the AGS and website, including regulations, codes of conduct, and policies, is current, with up-to-date metadata and version numbers. Regularly review and update this information. Promptly notify the Marketing Team of any changes, which must then be communicated to all Directors and students. Ensure that information is widely disseminated and accessible. The Director of Operations oversees these updates and reports on changes. Implementing these protocols ensures that all published information remains accurate and up-to-date, enabling stakeholders to make informed decisions. Regular updates and effective communication support transparency and compliance, while widespread dissemination enhances accessibility.
Rule Notification and Communication of Changes The Marketing Team must inform directors and the School community of changes through the website and AGS. Directors are responsible for communicating any significant updates to the School's Academic Regulations, codes of conduct, and policies to the relevant departments, teams, and students. Only the most recent versions, as uploaded by the Marketing Team, should be used. Effective notification and communication ensure that all stakeholders are aware of updates and use the latest information, maintaining consistency and clarity across the School.
Rule Departmental Training and Support Departmental directors must ensure that all staff are aware of and trained on the relevant School regulations, codes of conduct, and policies. Directors are accountable for the proper implementation of these guidelines within their departments and must report compliance to the Executive Committee. Only the most recent versions, as provided by the Marketing Team, should be used. This rule ensures that staff are informed and trained on current regulations, codes, and policies, promoting consistent and compliant implementation. Regular reporting to the Executive Committee helps maintain oversight and accountability.

Title

Rule
Accessibility of Regulations, Codes of Conduct, and Policies

All current versions of Academic Regulations, codes of conduct, and policies must be made readily accessible. They should be available on the School’s website and Automated Governance System (AGS) to ensure ease of access for all stakeholders.

Ensuring that the latest versions of regulations, codes of conduct, and policies are accessible supports transparency and allows all stakeholders to stay informed about the School’s standards and procedures. This promotes compliance and facilitates effective governance by providing clear, up-to-date information.

Rule
Version Control and Metadata for Regulations and Policies

All published regulations, codes of conduct, and policies must include:

Version numbers
Review dates
Owners

The Marketing Team is responsible for ensuring this information is included in all communications.

Including version numbers, review dates, and ownership details ensures clarity and helps track updates. This practice supports effective document management and aids in maintaining up-to-date information, which is crucial for compliance and transparency.

Rule
Accuracy of Information Policy (AOIP) Implementation

The School’s Accuracy of Information Policy (AOIP) requires the Marketing Team to:

Ensure that all information on the AGS and website, including regulations, codes of conduct, and policies, is current, with up-to-date metadata and version numbers.
Regularly review and update this information.
Promptly notify the Marketing Team of any changes, which must then be communicated to all Directors and students.
Ensure that information is widely disseminated and accessible.

The Director of Operations oversees these updates and reports on changes.

Implementing these protocols ensures that all published information remains accurate and up-to-date, enabling stakeholders to make informed decisions. Regular updates and effective communication support transparency and compliance, while widespread dissemination enhances accessibility.

Rule
Notification and Communication of Changes

The Marketing Team must inform directors and the School community of changes through the website and AGS. Directors are responsible for communicating any significant updates to the School's Academic Regulations, codes of conduct, and policies to the relevant departments, teams, and students. Only the most recent versions, as uploaded by the Marketing Team, should be used.

Effective notification and communication ensure that all stakeholders are aware of updates and use the latest information, maintaining consistency and clarity across the School.

Rule
Departmental Training and Support

Departmental directors must ensure that all staff are aware of and trained on the relevant School regulations, codes of conduct, and policies. Directors are accountable for the proper implementation of these guidelines within their departments and must report compliance to the Executive Committee. Only the most recent versions, as provided by the Marketing Team, should be used.

This rule ensures that staff are informed and trained on current regulations, codes, and policies, promoting consistent and compliant implementation. Regular reporting to the Executive Committee helps maintain oversight and accountability.

Maintaining Academic Standards and Quality Assurance

Title
Rule Role of the Academic Board in Regulatory Compliance The Academic Board, as senior academic authority, ensures all programmes adhere to regulatory quality and standards. Before the Board of Governors or Executive Committee makes changes to Academic Regulations, codes of conduct, or policies that affect academic standards and quality, the Academic Board must be consulted. This rule ensures that any amendments affecting academic standards are reviewed by the Academic Board, maintaining the integrity and quality of the School’s academic programmes.
Rule Scrutiny of Academic Standards and Quality The Academic Board is responsible for scrutinising the application of academic standards and quality across regulations, codes of conduct, and policies. This includes reviewing their implementation by the Education Department and Examination Boards, and reporting its findings to the Board of Governors. This rule ensures that the Academic Board systematically monitors and evaluates adherence to academic standards and quality, providing the Board of Governors with informed assessments on the effectiveness of regulations and policies.
Rule Compliance with Academic Regulations and Conduct All members of the School community, including students and staff, must adhere to the School's Academic Regulations, Codes of Conduct, and Policies. Compliance is a contractual obligation and outlined in the Student Charter. Breaches or non-compliance may result in misconduct proceedings and disciplinary action. This rule ensures that all members of the School understand their obligations and the potential consequences of failing to comply with established regulations and policies, thus maintaining the integrity and order of the academic environment.

Title

Rule
Role of the Academic Board in Regulatory Compliance

The Academic Board, as senior academic authority, ensures all programmes adhere to regulatory quality and standards. Before the Board of Governors or Executive Committee makes changes to Academic Regulations, codes of conduct, or policies that affect academic standards and quality, the Academic Board must be consulted.

This rule ensures that any amendments affecting academic standards are reviewed by the Academic Board, maintaining the integrity and quality of the School’s academic programmes.

Rule
Scrutiny of Academic Standards and Quality

The Academic Board is responsible for scrutinising the application of academic standards and quality across regulations, codes of conduct, and policies. This includes reviewing their implementation by the Education Department and Examination Boards, and reporting its findings to the Board of Governors.

This rule ensures that the Academic Board systematically monitors and evaluates adherence to academic standards and quality, providing the Board of Governors with informed assessments on the effectiveness of regulations and policies.

Rule
Compliance with Academic Regulations and Conduct

All members of the School community, including students and staff, must adhere to the School's Academic Regulations, Codes of Conduct, and Policies. Compliance is a contractual obligation and outlined in the Student Charter. Breaches or non-compliance may result in misconduct proceedings and disciplinary action.

This rule ensures that all members of the School understand their obligations and the potential consequences of failing to comply with established regulations and policies, thus maintaining the integrity and order of the academic environment.

Student Engagement

Title
Rule Student Consultation All proposals for major and minor changes to programmes, modules, regulations, codes of conduct, and policies must include consultation with students before submission to governing bodies for approval. This consultation forms part of the evidence considered by the governing bodies. Relevant governing bodies must confirm that students have been appropriately engaged in all matters affecting their experience at the School. Consulting students ensures that their perspectives are considered in decision-making processes, contributing to more effective and responsive policies and programmes. This engagement also helps governing bodies make informed decisions that reflect the needs and experiences of the student body.

Title

Rule
Student Consultation

All proposals for major and minor changes to programmes, modules, regulations, codes of conduct, and policies must include consultation with students before submission to governing bodies for approval. This consultation forms part of the evidence considered by the governing bodies. Relevant governing bodies must confirm that students have been appropriately engaged in all matters affecting their experience at the School.

Consulting students ensures that their perspectives are considered in decision-making processes, contributing to more effective and responsive policies and programmes. This engagement also helps governing bodies make informed decisions that reflect the needs and experiences of the student body.

Regulation and Policy Review and Enhancement

Title
Rule Monitoring and Reporting on Academic Regulations and Policies The School’s strategy is underpinned by its Academic Regulations, codes of conduct, and policies, each of which has associated metrics for measuring KPIs and effectiveness. Assigned owners must report on these metrics, and management reports are consolidated into annual reviews for various governing bodies. This process allows for the assessment of the strategy and the adjustment of regulations, codes of conduct, policies, and procedures as needed. Establishing and tracking metrics ensures that the School’s academic framework is effective and aligned with its strategic goals. Regular reporting and review facilitate informed decision-making and enable necessary adjustments to improve the School’s operations and compliance.
Rule Governance and Quality Assurance Structure The School’s governance structure ensures effective monitoring and information flow to maintain high standards and quality. Every member of the School community has a role in fostering an excellent academic environment. Reports from departmental directors and bodies are submitted to the Board of Governors, which reviews them and delegates actions to appropriate committees to uphold standards. Student involvement is integral to this process. A well-structured governance system ensures that standards and quality are maintained through effective oversight and clear communication channels. By engaging all stakeholders, including students, and delegating actions appropriately, the School enhances its ability to provide a high-quality academic experience.
Rule Encouragement of Continuous Improvement All members of the School community are encouraged to contribute to ongoing improvements by providing feedback, identifying shortcomings, and suggesting enhancements at any time. Encouraging feedback and suggestions from the entire community helps identify areas for improvement and fosters a culture of continuous enhancement. This proactive approach supports the School's commitment to evolving and maintaining high standards.
Rule Feedback Accessibility via AGS The Automated Governance System (AGS) allows all staff and students to easily provide feedback on the School's regulations, codes of conduct, policies, and processes. Providing a straightforward method for feedback ensures that all members of the School community can contribute their insights and suggestions, which supports continuous improvement and helps maintain the effectiveness of School policies and processes.
Rule Annual Review All Academic Regulations, codes of conduct, and policies are reviewed by relevant bodies, including the Board of Governors, to ensure they remain effective and adapt to changes in the external environment or internal priorities. Regular reviews by the Board of Governors and other bodies ensure that regulations, codes of conduct, and policies continue to meet their objectives and address evolving circumstances, thereby maintaining their relevance and effectiveness.
Rule Annual Report The School will produce an annual report following the Board of Governors’ strategic review. This report will detail actions taken over the year, including updates to regulations, codes of conduct, and policies based on feedback. The School will also use the website and AGS news sections to inform stakeholders about how their feedback has been addressed, when appropriate. The annual report and regular updates through the website and AGS ensure transparency and demonstrate how stakeholder feedback influences the School's policies and practices, reinforcing accountability and engagement.

Title

Rule
Monitoring and Reporting on Academic Regulations and Policies

The School’s strategy is underpinned by its Academic Regulations, codes of conduct, and policies, each of which has associated metrics for measuring KPIs and effectiveness. Assigned owners must report on these metrics, and management reports are consolidated into annual reviews for various governing bodies. This process allows for the assessment of the strategy and the adjustment of regulations, codes of conduct, policies, and procedures as needed.

Establishing and tracking metrics ensures that the School’s academic framework is effective and aligned with its strategic goals. Regular reporting and review facilitate informed decision-making and enable necessary adjustments to improve the School’s operations and compliance.

Rule
Governance and Quality Assurance Structure

The School’s governance structure ensures effective monitoring and information flow to maintain high standards and quality. Every member of the School community has a role in fostering an excellent academic environment. Reports from departmental directors and bodies are submitted to the Board of Governors, which reviews them and delegates actions to appropriate committees to uphold standards. Student involvement is integral to this process.

A well-structured governance system ensures that standards and quality are maintained through effective oversight and clear communication channels. By engaging all stakeholders, including students, and delegating actions appropriately, the School enhances its ability to provide a high-quality academic experience.

Rule
Encouragement of Continuous Improvement

All members of the School community are encouraged to contribute to ongoing improvements by providing feedback, identifying shortcomings, and suggesting enhancements at any time.

Encouraging feedback and suggestions from the entire community helps identify areas for improvement and fosters a culture of continuous enhancement. This proactive approach supports the School's commitment to evolving and maintaining high standards.

Rule
Feedback Accessibility via AGS

The Automated Governance System (AGS) allows all staff and students to easily provide feedback on the School's regulations, codes of conduct, policies, and processes.

Providing a straightforward method for feedback ensures that all members of the School community can contribute their insights and suggestions, which supports continuous improvement and helps maintain the effectiveness of School policies and processes.

Rule
Annual Review

All Academic Regulations, codes of conduct, and policies are reviewed by relevant bodies, including the Board of Governors, to ensure they remain effective and adapt to changes in the external environment or internal priorities.

Regular reviews by the Board of Governors and other bodies ensure that regulations, codes of conduct, and policies continue to meet their objectives and address evolving circumstances, thereby maintaining their relevance and effectiveness.

Rule
Annual Report

The School will produce an annual report following the Board of Governors’ strategic review. This report will detail actions taken over the year, including updates to regulations, codes of conduct, and policies based on feedback.

The School will also use the website and AGS news sections to inform stakeholders about how their feedback has been addressed, when appropriate.

The annual report and regular updates through the website and AGS ensure transparency and demonstrate how stakeholder feedback influences the School's policies and practices, reinforcing accountability and engagement.

Metrics and KPIs

The following metrics will be measured and regularly reviewed as key performance indicators for the School to ensure the effectiveness of this policy and associated operations.

Title
Accuracy of Published Information Measure the percentage of errors or discrepancies identified in published regulations, codes of conduct, and policies on the website and AGS. Ensures that the information available to stakeholders is accurate, which is crucial for transparency and effective communication.
Communication Timeliness Monitor the average time taken by the Marketing Team to post approved policy updates on the website and AGS after receiving notification. Ensures that updates are communicated promptly, keeping stakeholders informed of the latest changes.
Stakeholder Engagement Rate Track the percentage of stakeholders (students, staff, and faculty) who provide feedback on proposed changes to regulations and policies. Measures the level of stakeholder involvement, which is important for inclusive decision-making and policy relevance.
Timeliness of Regulatory Amendments Measure the percentage of proposed amendments to Academic Regulations and Codes of Conduct that are approved and implemented within the specified time frame (e.g., 3 months). Ensures that changes are made promptly, maintaining the relevance and accuracy of regulations and policies.
Training Completion Rate Track the percentage of staff and students who complete training sessions related to new or updated regulations and policies. Ensures that everyone is adequately informed and trained on the latest regulations, enhancing compliance and understanding.

Title

Accuracy of Published Information
Measure the percentage of errors or discrepancies identified in published regulations, codes of conduct, and policies on the website and AGS.
Ensures that the information available to stakeholders is accurate, which is crucial for transparency and effective communication.

Communication Timeliness
Monitor the average time taken by the Marketing Team to post approved policy updates on the website and AGS after receiving notification.
Ensures that updates are communicated promptly, keeping stakeholders informed of the latest changes.

Stakeholder Engagement Rate
Track the percentage of stakeholders (students, staff, and faculty) who provide feedback on proposed changes to regulations and policies.
Measures the level of stakeholder involvement, which is important for inclusive decision-making and policy relevance.

Timeliness of Regulatory Amendments
Measure the percentage of proposed amendments to Academic Regulations and Codes of Conduct that are approved and implemented within the specified time frame (e.g., 3 months).
Ensures that changes are made promptly, maintaining the relevance and accuracy of regulations and policies.

Training Completion Rate
Track the percentage of staff and students who complete training sessions related to new or updated regulations and policies.
Ensures that everyone is adequately informed and trained on the latest regulations, enhancing compliance and understanding.