Student Disciplinary Policy
Policy Statement
The School is committed to upholding a respectful and responsible environment for all students, staff, and visitors. Students must adhere to the Student Charter, School regulations, and their contractual obligations. Breaches of conduct may lead to disciplinary action, including consideration of criminal conduct by the Police. Where concerns relate primarily to a student’s wellbeing or ability to engage with study, the School may consider the Fitness to Study procedure, which is supportive and distinct from disciplinary action. Students are also responsible for their guests' behaviour.
The Office of the Independent Adjudicator for Higher Education (OIA) operates an independent scheme for reviewing student complaints, and the School is a member of this scheme. If a student is dissatisfied with the outcome of a matter under this policy, they may be able to submit a complaint to the OIA. Information about making a complaint to the OIA, including what it can and cannot consider and the remedies available, is available at: https://www.oiahe.org.uk/students.
Students must normally complete the School’s internal disciplinary procedures before submitting a complaint to the OIA. Once the School’s internal procedures are exhausted and there are no further internal steps available, the School will issue a Completion of Procedures Letter.
Any complaint to the OIA must be submitted within 12 months of the date of the Completion of Procedures Letter. Information about Completion of Procedures Letters is available at: https://www.oiahe.org.uk/providers/completion-of-procedures-letters.
Principles
- Fairness: Ensuring all disciplinary procedures are conducted fairly and impartially.
- Accessibility: Providing clear information about the disciplinary process and considering reasonable adjustments for disabled students.
- Transparency: Making the disciplinary process and consequences clear to all students.
- Consistency: Applying the policy consistently across all cases of misconduct.
- Respect: Treating all parties involved in disciplinary matters with respect and consideration.
- Accountability: Holding students account able for their actions in upholding School standards.
- Proportionality: Ensuring that disciplinary actions are proportionate to the nature of the misconduct.
- Independence: Ensuring that disciplinary decisions and appeals are made by staff who have not been involved in the matter at an earlier stage and that conflicts of interest are declared and managed.
- Support: Offering appropriate support to students going through the disciplinary process.
Regulatory Context
This Policy has been developed in line with the applicable laws, regulations, regulatory advice, and sector best practices, including the following:
| Authority | Name | Url |
|---|---|---|
| Office for Students (OfS) |
Regulatory framework for higher education in England
This framework outlines OfS' primary aim to ensure positive outcomes for students, including access, success, and progress in higher education. It covers quality academic experience, progress into employment, and value for money. |
Redirect |
| Office for Students (OfS) |
Regulatory Notices and Advice
Regulatory notices are additional information about OfS' regulatory requirements and are part of the regulatory framework. Regulatory advice helps providers understand and meet OfS requirements. |
Redirect |
| Quality Assurance Agency (QAA) |
The Quality Code
This code represents a shared understanding of quality practice across the UK higher education sector, protecting public and student interests and championing the UK's reputation for quality. |
Redirect |
| Quality Assurance Agency (QAA) |
Advice - Academic Misconduct
Guidance on handling academic misconduct for higher education providers. |
Redirect |
| Universities UK |
Guidance - Handling criminal misconduct allegations
Guidance on handling alleged student misconduct which may also be a criminal offence. |
Redirect |
| Universities UK |
Guidance on online harassment
A comprehensive guidance on tackling online harassment and promoting online welfare in the higher education sector. |
Redirect |
| Office of the Independent Adjudicator |
Good Practice Framework
The OIA Good Practice Framework sets expectations for fair, transparent, accessible, timely and independent student complaint and appeal processes, focused on resolving issues and improving practice. |
Redirect |
Definition of Misconduct
Misconduct is defined as behaviour that disrupts School activities, negatively impacts individuals working or studying at the School, or damages the School’s reputation. Disciplinary action may be taken for misconduct occurring in any context, including field trips, placements, online platforms, or on social media. This rule ensures that all forms of misconduct, regardless of where or how they occur, are addressed consistently and fairly. By covering all relevant contexts, it reinforces the School’s commitment to maintaining a positive and respectful environment for its community. |
Procedure for Lodging Complaints
All reports of potential misconduct, whether occurring on or off School premises, must be directed to the Director of Student Services. This includes instances involving individual students or groups of students; in the case of groups, their cases may be addressed collectively in a single process or panel hearing. Reports should be submitted either in person or in writing to the Director of Student Services or any School staff member, who will ensure the report is forwarded appropriately. An acknowledgement of receipt will be sent via email within 5 days. The Director of Student Services will initially handle the matter. The School is dedicated to maintaining fairness and ensures that all students receive a thorough and impartial review of disciplinary reports. This includes providing access to relevant information and the opportunity for students to respond to the allegations. This process guarantees that all reports of misconduct are managed efficiently and transparently. By outlining clear reporting and handling procedures, the School promotes fairness and accountability, ensuring that every student’s case is considered with due diligence and in line with School policies. |
Administration and Oversight of Misconduct Reports
The Director of Student Services is responsible for coordinating all reports of student misconduct. Based on the severity of each case, they will either manage it directly or delegate it as appropriate. Per below, major misconduct cases will then be referred to the Student Disciplinary Panel for further consideration. If a report involves behaviour that may constitute a criminal offence, the Director of Student Services will also notify the police. The Director of Student Services will maintain a register of all student misconduct reports and the outcomes of Disciplinary Panels. This record will be kept for the duration of the student’s enrolment and deleted twelve months after their departure or graduation. Full access to this register is restricted to the Director of Student Service sand the Executive Committee. Other senior staff may be granted limited access on a case-by-case basis. Centralising the coordination of misconduct reports ensures that all cases are handled efficiently and appropriately by a designated individual. Referring serious cases to the Student Disciplinary Panel and reporting potential criminal activities to the police ensures that serious issues are managed correctly and legally. Maintaining a detailed register of all reports and outcomes provides accountability and facilitates proper record-keeping. Limiting access to disciplinary records protects student privacy while allowing relevant staff members to review records when necessary. |
Preliminary Inquiry and Authority of the Investigating Officer
Upon receiving a complaint, the Director of Student Services will assess its severity. Depending on this assessment, they will either act as the Investigating Officer or delegate this role to another School staff member. The designated Investigating Officer will meet separately with the reporting party and the student involved, typically within 14 days, to establish key facts. Additional meetings with other witnesses or relevant School members may be arranged as necessary. The Investigating Officer will be accompanied by a note-taker during each meeting, ensuring accurate records are kept. These notes will be sent to the interviewees for review and confirmation. The student involved in the complaint is generally expected to attend meetings in person and may be accompanied by a School member or a Students' representative. In exceptional circumstances, attendance via video call may be arranged. If other evidence is available, such as CCTV footage, photographs, emails, or social media posts, it will be included in the investigation. The Investigating Officer will then compile an investigation report, clearly outlining the facts of the case. This report, along with any outcomes, will usually be completed within 21 days of the initial complaint. If the outcomes and sanctions fall within the Investigating Officer’s jurisdiction as outlined in Appendix B, they will immediately impose the sanctions and inform the student both verbally and in writing. However, if the misconduct is considered 'major' or if the outcomes exceed the Investigating Officer’s authority, the case will be referred to the Student Disciplinary Panel. This process ensures that complaints of misconduct are handled promptly, fairly, and thoroughly, maintaining the integrity of the School’s disciplinary procedures and providing a clear, structured approach to resolving issues. |
Disciplinary Panel Composition and Formal Proceedings
If an allegation of misconduct is considered a major offence or falls outside the Investigating Officer's authority as outlined in Appendix B, a School Disciplinary Panel will be convened. The following steps will be followed:
This structured process ensures that major misconduct cases are handled with fairness, transparency, and due process. Each step is designed to protect the rights of all parties involved, maintain confidentiality, and uphold the integrity of the School's disciplinary procedures. By clearly defining the roles, timelines, and responsibilities, the School ensures that decisions are made objectively, and appropriate actions are taken in a timely manner. |
Appeal Process and Student Rights
In all cases, appeals may be submitted under the following circumstances:
A. Appeals Against Investigating Officer's Decision: Students wishing to appeal a decision made by an Investigating Officer must submit a written appeal to the Chair of the Executive Committee within 14 days, clearly stating the grounds for the appeal. The Chair will review the evidence and assess whether the decision or sanction is appropriate. If the sanction is deemed appropriate, the Chair will inform the student by email within 14 days that the original outcome stands and that the appeal is unsuccessful. If the sanction is found to be excessive or inappropriate, the Chair will amend it and notify the student and Investigating Officer accordingly via email within 14 days. B. Appeals Against Disciplinary Panel's Decision: Students wishing to appeal a decision made by a Disciplinary Panel must email the Chair of the Executive Committee within 14 days of the decision, specifying the grounds for appeal. The Chair will evaluate whether the appeal is based on valid grounds. If no valid grounds are found, the appeal will be dismissed. If valid grounds are identified, the appeal will be referred to another member of the Executive Committee (excluding the Director of Student Services) for further review. This member will decide whether the appeal is upheld and, if so, whether the disciplinary charges should be dismissed or reconsidered by another Disciplinary Panel or relevant officer. The student will receive the decision by email within 14 days, with a copy sent to the Director of Student Services. Final Appeal to Independent Adjudicator: When the internal disciplinary process is complete and there are no further internal steps available, the School will issue a Completion of Procedures Letter. If the student remains dissatisfied, they may submit a complaint to the Office of the Independent Adjudicator for Higher Education (OIA). Students must make their complaint to the OIA within 12 months of the date of the Completion of Procedures Letter. Information about the OIA Scheme is available here: https://www.oiahe.org.uk/students. Information about Completion of Procedures Letters is available here: https://www.oiahe.org.uk/providers/completion-of-procedures-letters. This appeals process ensures fairness and transparency in reviewing disciplinary decisions, allowing students to challenge decisions they believe were made in error or were overly harsh. By outlining clear steps and timelines, the School guarantees that appeals are handled efficiently, maintaining the integrity of the disciplinary system while protecting students' rights. |
Privacy and Information Disclosure Guidelines
Confidentiality will be maintained for information disclosed during or resulting from disciplinary proceedings. Students on professional programmes should be aware that investigation findings may be communicated to their professional body and may be subject to local Fitness to Study procedures. Staff and students are encouraged to raise concerns in good faith without fear of recrimination. The Director of Student Services will securely retain records of all disciplinary cases according to the School’s policies. The School will collect aggregated data on student disciplinary cases and report to the Academic Board and Board of Governors regularly to ensure policy effectiveness. Maintaining confidentiality protects individuals’ privacy and ensures trust in the disciplinary process. Communication with professional bodies is necessary for students in professional programmes. Allowing staff and students to raise concerns without fear promotes a transparent environment. Secure record-keeping aligns with policy compliance and proper documentation. Regular reporting assists in evaluating and assuring the effectiveness of the Student Disciplinary Policy. |
Appendix A: Illustrative Misconduct Behaviours
Examples of misconduct include:
The list outlines various behaviours considered misconduct to ensure clear understanding of what constitutes unacceptable conduct. Each example addresses specific actions that could negatively impact the School environment, its community, or its reputation, ensuring that all members are aware of the standards expected. |
Appendix B: Disciplinary Measures and Penalties
An Investigating Officer may impose the following sanctions summarily:
A Student Disciplinary Panel may impose all of the above sanctions and additionally:
The range of sanctions ensures that responses to misconduct are appropriate and proportional to the severity of the behaviour. By allowing both Investigating Officers and Student Disciplinary Panels to impose various penalties, the system maintains flexibility to address different levels of misconduct effectively. This approach ensures that penalties are fair and tailored to the nature of the offence, helping to uphold standards and discipline within the School. |
The following metrics will be measured and regularly reviewed as key performance indicators for the School to ensure the effectiveness of this policy and associated operations.
Appeals Process EfficiencyTrack the average time taken to resolve appeals, aiming for resolution within 30 days of the appeal submission, with at least 90% of appeals resolved within this timeframe. Efficient handling of appeals ensures that students have a fair opportunity to challenge decisions while maintaining procedural integrity and reducing delays. |
Disciplinary Hearing Completion RateTrack the percentage of disciplinary hearings completed within 30 days of the initial misconduct report, targeting a completion rate of 90% or higher. Ensuring hearings are held promptly maintains fairness and efficiency in the disciplinary process, minimising delays and uncertainty for involved parties. |
Incident Reporting Response TimeMeasure the average time taken from the receipt of a misconduct report to its initial review by the Investigating Officer, aiming for a response time of within 48 hours. Timely initial responses ensure prompt attention to issues, preventing escalation and demonstrating commitment to swift action in upholding standards. |
Number of Misconduct Cases Reported AnnuallyTrack the total number of misconduct cases reported each year, with a goal of a 10% reduction year-over-year as a measure of improving student conduct. A decrease in reported cases can indicate successful preventive measures and effective communication of expectations, contributing to a more respectful environment. |
Rate of Compliance with Recommended SanctionsMeasure the percentage of students who comply with sanctions imposed, aiming for a compliance rate of 95% or higher. High compliance rates indicate that sanctions are effectively enforced and accepted, which helps in maintaining discipline and ensuring adherence to the policy. |